Skip to main content

Anything but a mug's game

Some jobs may be better paid and some may simply be easier, but teaching has its own advantages, says Matthew Godfrey


This article appeared in The Daily Telegraph on 4 December 2004

Recently, I was talking to a friend who is bored with his job. He was complaining about the long hours he has to work and how he was looking forward to going on holiday. "I might even get to read a novel," he said. "That's something I haven't done in a long time."

Like him, I was once in a job that I disliked and thought a waste of time. When I became a teacher, many of my friends rightly assumed that, like the Robin Williams character in the film Dead Poets Society, I was motivated at least in part by altruistic urges to "make a difference" and "put something back". In practice, I find the intellectual demands of teaching to be the most satisfying aspect of the job.

As an example, I told my friend that I had been re-reading Othello over half term. I had vague memories of studying the play as a teenager, but had forgotten how gripping and moving its tale of passion and betrayal is. I loved reading it again, but only opened it because I am going to teach it to one of my A-level classes next term. Had I not become a teacher, it would have remained unopened, gathering dust for many more years.

Furthermore, reading Othello – or any play, poem or novel – with a view to teaching it forces you to be a far more incisive reader.
Before becoming a teacher, I might have briefly touched on questions such as "what does the play reveal about the nature of jealousy?" and "what drives Iago to be so evil and manipulative?" over a drink in the interval of some production. Now, I have to consider them carefully and think how to make them accessible to my pupils.

Also, classroom discussions – even with younger pupils – always produce fresh perspectives, questions and ideas that do not occur to me when reading something on my own. Of course, lessons are not always successful, but when pupils are engaged and enthusiastic, their capacity to absorb ideas and information is astonishing and infectious.

I find the buzz, rhythm and sounds of school life – corridor chatter, orchestra and choir practices, team banter on the sports fields – to be a refreshing, stimulating alternative to office life. A normal day at Latymer Upper in west London, where I teach English, might include: discussing Shakespeare or Tennessee Williams with A-level classes in the morning; popping into a topical debate at lunchtime; watching a game of football in the afternoon; and listening to a music recital after school.

I have also found myself directing a play and giving talks to the sixth form on areas of special interest to me. Not many other jobs offer such variety and sense of community.

If teaching is to become a fashionable career choice again – and I am sure it will – it will be because it offers this kind of varied and stimulating working environment, one that cannot be matched by the commercial sector.

In short, if they are to recruit and retain good teachers, schools must do everything they can to maintain and protect – in some cases, restore – three core, distinctive and very appealing perks: intellectual stimulation; financial security; and a large dose of fun.
It is often said that the intellectual challenge and fun of teaching have disappeared under a flood of bureaucracy, bad behaviour, assessment, limited extra-curricular activities, a narrow curriculum, low expectations and so on.

People will not want to become teachers if they think they are joining a stressful examinations treadmill. Unfortunately, this image is backed up by the media's tendency to focus on the failings of some schools.

My own experience as a teacher in two contrasting schools is that these problems become serious only if the senior management allows them to do so. My time at Latymer, and my contacts with teachers in other well-run schools – both state and independent – have shown me that teaching can still provide a wholesome and enjoyable way to earn a living.

Teaching is not especially well paid, and for some people that is sufficient reason not to choose it as a career. But teachers are envied during recessions because our jobs are securer than most.
In addition, ours is one of the few remaining professions to offer a good, reliable final-salary pension scheme. These benefits lack the allure of the high starting salaries and bonuses offered by some employers, but they are significant advantages, none the less.

Most of the time, I agree with friends who tell me that I get to "make a difference" as a teacher. I have found that an educational environment is a more fulfilling place to work than one focused chiefly on profit. Nowadays, hardly anyone chooses a career for purely altruistic reasons, but there are many other reasons why teaching is a terrific job.


Published in The Daily Telegraph on 4 December 2004

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pupils be using tablet computers in school?

English teacher Matthew Godfrey weighs up the pros and cons of our burgeoning reliance on digital devices in the classroom This article appeared in The Daily Telegraph on 31 August 2014 As parents of three young children and regular users of the M25, my wife and I know how effective tablet devices are at preventing family meltdowns in traffic jams. A spell on the iPad is normally enough to stave off sibling scrapes in the car, as well as cries of “Are we nearly there yet?” We are always grateful for a little “iPeace” when we face another delay around junctions nine and 10. But as we hand the gadget over, we have mixed feelings. There is mild guilt: shouldn’t we be engaging our children in stimulating conversation or playing an inventive game to stretch their imagination? And there is apprehension, too: at some stage, the contraption will need to be wrenched back from them. The addictiveness of some games and software is such that this can be like stealing a banana ...

A master class in teaching

Curiosity and just a touch of envy prompted Matthew Godfrey to sit in on a colleague's lessons   This article appeared in The Daily Telegraph on 17 January 2006 I had a lively debate with one of my English classes recently about what their ideal school would be like. The pupils, who were in Year 8 (ages 12 and 13), had some predictable requests, such as more free time, less homework and no uniform. There were some radical suggestions, too: one girl wanted no teachers at all and one of the boys was adamant that corporal punishment should be restored immediately. Then one pupil demanded: "We want more lessons like Mr Orme's." This provoked a collective gasp of approval. I was not surprised; our pupils have long revered Mr Orme, who has taught history at the school for nearly 40 years. Nevertheless, curiosity and mild envy provoked me to ask why they so enjoyed his lessons. "We learn so much", "They're fun!" and "I don'...